Downloading Music Off the Net
I'll be upfront on this. I've never downloaded music off the net illegally. When I bought an HP computer, I did participate in a music program that let you download music through that pay-for-service, but the choices of what you could download were crappy, so I opted out, and I've never bothered to interest myself in online music again.
So, does this mean I buy lots of CDs from stores? No, it doesn't. I rarely buy music from any of the retail stores, mainly because most of what comes out these days is prepackaged garbage. You might get one really good tune on an album, but then you've bought a CD worth of junk. So I rarely buy music anymore unless it comes out from one of my five favorite artists. And that's it. You can't goad me into wanting to buy more music.
So, why is this important? I think it's important because I don't believe I'm the only person with this type of attitude. We have opted out of the music CD market. Where I used to buy approximately 40 to 50 CDs a year, I buy perhaps 3 or 4 now. If that. I believe there are a lot of people just like me, the people who are of the age where we have that type of income to buy such items, who have decided we're not supporting this industry that has done so little for us.
It's not about wanting to support the artists, who get ripped off by the music companies. Personally, I could care less about the artists. They are all richer than me, and they won't return an email from me if I ever wrote them, so why should I care squat about them and their lack of more wealth? So, what is it that causes me to care?
I care that the music industry is looking at people like me, people who USED to be customers, and they are pointing fingers at me, indicating that I must be pirating music because I am not buying it anymore. They are making these accusations on a daily basis, and they don't care who they alienate when they say it. I wouldn't be suprised to see one of those lawsuits against me, even though I don't even subscribe to any of the download services that seem to let you do this sort of thing anyway. I really have that little respect for them and their desire to profit off of everyone who has opted out of their demographic.
This whole attack of theirs on the downloading populace is really sickening, and that's what bothers me. They can't figure out how to target their own industry (which IS the problem) but want to get as much profit as possible with as little quality as possible. That's what bothers me the most.
A long time ago, they promised us that the move to CDs would end up costing us about $9.99 per CD when they were released. That never happened. Then, when they realized how much money they were losing with $12.99 as an on sale CD with no customers buying, they started to announce they were going to start moving those CDs to $9.99. This is after over a decade of fleecing us at the higher prices. And then what happened? The prices didn't go down. Sure, an ocassional artist will be featured at $9.99, but it wasn't the move they promised in the business news of every newspaper in the United States. That was two years ago and last year they promised this. They, however, didn't do a lot of work to hype this to the general populace (most likely because they really never had any intentions of keeping this promise).
Now, the record industries are talking about doing the online thing again, and they're targeting $9.99 as the price of a full album to be downloaded online. When have we heard this before? It's sad that they think we have no memory of the past.
I refuse to participate. I also refuse to participate in any criminal activity as well. I just have decided that I buy a few artists every year, and if they can't handle that, then perhaps they should get a paper route and earn a real living.
Stumble It!