The Western Herald - Neither party seems to care about new ideas
Neither party seems to care about new ideas
By Duane Gundrum
Opinion Editor
July 21, 2004
With an election around the corner, it should come as no surprise that both major presidential candidates are showing a great interest in attracting the younger voters of America. In a recent response to an editorial in USA Today about both sides not attracting youthful voters, both Terry McAuliffe, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, and Ed Gillespie, chairman of the Republican National Committee, had something to say.
The Democratic response was that its party is “committed to finding new ways to connect with young voters — to listen to their concerns, but also to provide them with direct avenues of empowerment so that they can make a difference in their communities.” The Republican response was “we have the right message and the right candidates, especially for the next generation,” and even more important, at least because they are actually serious about this, they introduced a “56-foot, 80,000-pound 18 wheeler” they called “Reggie the Registration Rig,” which visits “college campuses, NASCAR races, World Wrestling Entertainment matches and scores of other events that are packed with younger voters.”
Huh? Am I missing something here? Are we trying to attract thinking voters or viewers of “Finding Nemo”?
This is the problem I have encountered this summer as I decided that I wanted to be more involved in the political process. At first, I tried to find at least one campaign interested in wanting help from a political scientist with a talent for writing, even if my mommy does dress me funny. I gave up on trying to find any interest in the Republican Party, as it hasn’t been interested in attracting those not within the mainstream since day one of the current administration. Believe me. I’ve tried.
So, I began to buy into the “take back America” slogans of the Democratic Party, an organization claiming to be speaking for the Americans who have been pushed out of the system by the Bush Administration. Well, my inquiries and attempts have shown me something I didn’t expect: The Democrats aren’t any different. No one in the Democratic Party was at all interested in what I had to say if it wasn’t written within the confines of what is part of the Kerry dialogue.
When I attempted to get information about participating in the campaign, I was told that people with political science Ph.D. experience weren’t really needed because those “positions” were taken up at the national level. They were more interested in people to pass out bumper stickers and contribute money directly to the campaign. The few times that I tried to make an actual contribution in the dialogue, I was told that policy was a national thing, and that there was no room for that sort of thing on a personal level. I can’t begin to describe the number of local campaign people who stared at me with blank faces whenever I asked about what the Democrats would do about this or that issue that was important to me. I got the impression they didn’t care.
From my experience, the election for the Democrats has become about winning back the White House from a person they consider bad. But the goal hasn’t been to win it back for the rest of us. It has been to win it back for those who are within the mainstream system at the top levels; the rest of us really don’t seem to have much input.
What this has shown me is that this coming election is about keeping the status quo for one or the other side, but has little to do with enfranchising the disfranchised. As we see more and more attention to attracting undecided voters, keep in mind that no one is trying to attract new ideas. And it bothers me that I seem to be the only one concerned.
Duane Gundrum, the Western Herald opinion editor, is a Ph.D. candidate from Santa Monica, Calif., studying political science.
Stumble It!