When I was a little kid, my grandfather used to take me to the local outdoor mall, and he would point at strangers (to me) and say "Look, Duane, that's the mayor. Go say hello to him." And little Duane would wander up to the mayor of the city and say hi. He would do this with all sorts of different people, as I think he believed it was the way to get little Duane to get used to talking to strangers.
Anyway, fast forward a few years. Okay, a lot of years. And I find myself doing the same sort of thing still to this day. Today was a good example. I tend to like to eat my breakfast/lunch (not brunch) at some of the fast food places around town so I tend to go to the same places all the time. Some months back, I wrote of my encounter with a presidential candidate who I ran into at Carls Jr. Okay, he's a perpetual candidate and has run for president since the 1970s, but my understanding is that no one else has ever actually landed an interview with him. Well, two hours later, I found myself unable to end the interview, but I digress....
Today, I was in McDonalds when an older man decided to talk to me and tell me all about the past. Let's call him Frank. Well, Frank was 81 years old, and he had lots of stories to tell. And I found myself fascinated, listening to stories of an era that I knew mainly from books and whatever other medium might have given me some type of stilted insight. We talked for several hours (mainly him talking and me listening), and I found myself filled with lots of data I had never experienced before. When I finally went home, I felt like I actually gained knowledge I probably would never have had before that conversation started.
Well, this is kind of what I wanted to talk about today. People today just don't seem interested in doing that sort of listening. I've had lots of conversations and observations of conversations with people these days and all people want to do is talk. They don't listen. Or they pretend to listen. But what they're really doing when they're listening is trying to figure out what they're going to say next, and then they're looking for an opening where they can interject with whatever it is they have to say. That's not conversing. Yet, way too often, that's all we seem to be doing anymore.
Debate is like this. Sure, you have to listen to the other side, but ONLY so you can counter whatever the other side has to say. But that's debate. It shouldn't be that way in the real world as well. But it is.
Ever watch a news show where people are talking back and forth? How often does both sides of that conversation come away with something new? Or do they end up finishing the conversation with a mediator stating something like: "Well, this is a great debate, but we have to switch to Holly for weather now"? The very foundation of this country was built upon the idea that deliberation is what drives us forward. If we don't deliberate, then how do we actually make decisions? Well, a lot of those decisions these days are political (a bunch of people you agree with overrule a bunch of people you don't agree with...conversation really doesn't take place).
I'd argue that we are moving into a subsequent generation that no longer cares what anyone else has to say. We all know better than everyone else, so why waste our time? Why listen to some 81 year old guy about lots of inspirational things that came from another era when we can chalk it up to yet another story by some guy who doesn't know as much as we know? I can't tell you how many conversations I've had with people who claim to argue along the lines of "well, I can't explain why this is, but it just is."
Is there a way to fix this? Yeah, I think there is, but we're all too busy with our own opinions to take the time to think differently, so what's the use anyway?
Labels: Communication Theory
Stumble It!