Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Sunday, November 16, 2008
It's the little things that sometimes matter most
For example, I went to a blackmarket shop (not really as evil as it sounds) and found Diet Dr Pepper. I used to drink Diet Dr Pepper by the caseload with more per day than anyone ever should. I bought probably 18 cans of it (at an insane profit to the seller), and this was weeks ago. About 3 or so. I still have 4 left. I find myself happy that I have them, and that I found them. I drink one every now and then. Okay, doing the math, that's almost one a day, but it sure doesn't feel that way. I guess a few days in the beginning I had an absurd amount of them, having missed them, but it's been few really since then.
The same goes for computer games. Fallout 3 is out, and I really, really, really want to play it cause I love the Fallout franchise. But I have my laptop here instead of my desktop (who knows if I'll ever see that computer again...), so I can't really play Fallout 3 without problems. Therefore, I have to find my pleasure in other things. So, I've managed to search the web to find copies of some of the older games that used to be the greatest games ever created. Last week, I was spending my idle time playing Millennium: Return to Earth, which was one of the first great space strategy games back in the 1980s. Still a great game today. Sure, it doesn't have the graphics of today, but the game was well designed and there's a reason it took the game world by storm. Right now, I'm playing a game I remember from 20 years ago called Phantasie 3, a typical "find the evil wizard and kill him before he kills you" kind of game. I loved it way back then. I'm now loving it way back now. It's campy, mainly because it set the stage for so many other roleplaying games to come, so you can see the genius in this game because you realize so many others copied what they tried to do in this little, simple game. Peole tend to forget that some of the greatest innovations are much as Newton claimed in his accomplishments: "On the backs of giants".
My medical status has been a trial of trials. I don't even want to get into how much this has been costing me because my boss can't figure out I'm trying to tell him he needs to supply me with national insurance (which is the law). It's costing me a fortune every time I have to go see a doctor, and I'm getting so frustrated with the whole process. The woman he hired to be the office manager (and translator) speaks about as much English as he does, and neither one of them understands my attempts at Korean (because they really don't listen anyway), so I keep getting into crappy situations with this here. I had a recent scare (which isn't really completely over) with my blood sugar going through the roof because I was lacking a medication. I have it now, but the doctor didn't understand and prescribed only half the dosage necessary, which means I need this fixed soon or things are just going to be really bad. Essentially, for the last three weeks I've been living with the immediate threat of a heart attack because of my situation. I don't know if it's solved because I have no way of gauging it, although I'm doing everything I can to fix it. My vision has been really screwed up lately as a result, meaning I can barely read anything (although I can see normally elsewise. The vision appears to be coming back slowly (since I received the half dosage of the medication I was lacking), but I'm not completely confident all is well yet.
If it's any consolation, I've lost a ton of weight since I've been here. I was weighing about 170 lbs (which was way too much). I'm coming in around 154-7 these days. It probably has something to do with the fact that I walk everywhere here in Korea. Some of the walks really suck, because there are hills here that hill giants would frown upon having to walk, and they're everywhere. Also, there are no elevators that people take in the subways, so you go way down into the ground and then you walk up TONS of stairs to get back to the surface again. There are a few times where I'm completely winded and feel embarrassed because I just don't have enough energy to get out to the top of the stairs of the subway after I reach my destination. One habit I got rid of immediately after arriving here was eating at McDonalds and Burger King. Yeah, they have those places here, but you can't survive on that stuff as food. I find myself a lot happier with frozen chicken meals or Healthy Choice soups that I have discovered at Costco (which I recently discovered are sold at a local market for about the same price).
As for work, well, it's better than when I started, but it's usually chaos most days of the week. Classes start up brand new and then get cancelled later that week. And no one tells you the class was cancelled until you've finished preparing that day's lesson and are about to walk upstairs to the classroom where everyone has already been informed a day ago that the class was cancelled. That gets old really fast, and no matter how many times you complain, they stare at you as if it's not a problem (BECAUSE THEY KNEW).
As for relationships, not even thinking about that because I'm trying to fix my life first. Too many Maslow needs are necessary to accomplish before I can even think about taking care of any social aspects of my life. But I'm working on it. We'll see how things work out.
Labels: Korea
Stumble It!
Friday, November 14, 2008
Been told the thesis is now back on track
I almost didn't go to UOP two years back because somebody in the graduate office totally screwed up the paperwork. The next year, some mysterious person in the graduate office seriously screwed up the paperwork for three incoming graduate students to our department. 10 years before that, some mysterious person in the graduate office screwed up my paperwork to the graudate office when I was first accepted at UOP before I gave up on the process and went to Western Michigan University instead where at least they didn't totally screw up the paperwork when trying to get through their stupid paperwork system.
So, the response to these types of situations is to sweep it up under the rug and hope no one notices. The person is NEVER disciplined, which means she'll continue doing the same thing over and over again, which keeps leading to horrific results for the client, the students.
I'm most likely graduating now. Until this entity fucks that up again somehow. I don't know how she will, but I have a lot of faith in her and the system's ability to look the other way when it ends up happening regardless of common sense or those pesky standard operating procedures and regulations they fool themselves into believing might actually cause someone to do their job correctly. Yeah, I'm really steamed right now.
Stumble It!
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Stuck in Korea while my life is falling apart back in the states
I don't know what happened. I was told that it was going through the usual process, that it was being formatted to fit the parameters of what the grad school needed, but the Grad School says they've never even seen it. If they would have seen it, it would have met the Nov. 15 cut off for graduation. But they have no record of it. I can't get a hold of the person who knows what's going on, so I'm pretty much screwed. I went through hell trying to finish that thesis with the final revision, and it was for no reason. I'm not going to graduate.
And I was done. Everyone approved it. And I got killed by red tape that shouldn't have ever happened.
If I could find a subway station that actually stopped at a bridge, I'd finally jump off one. I've really had enough of this ride. I want to get off.
Stumble It!
Monday, November 10, 2008
The Ameriad available on Amazon's Kindle
The Ameriad, for those of you who don't know, is a humorous Greek epic that tells the story of Amereaus, one of the survivors of the Trojan War, who goes on a journey to find a new land, which will one day be called America. It took me five years to write, and there is a lot of great stuff in this book, especially if you like humor, archaeology, Greek guys who tear off their tunics to beat their chests, and gods that take themselves way too seriously.
It should be up within 24-72 hours. That's all. I'm thinking of putting the already published novels up on Kindle as well, as I do own the digital recording rights for those books, even though they were published by specific publishers for first rights. I'll see how The Ameriad does first.
Labels: Writing
Stumble It!
Saturday, November 08, 2008
Democratic Politicians Are All Vying for High Profile Jobs With Obama Administration
This country is in dire need of a Colin Powell-like leader, not another freaking politician, but if things go the way that quid pro quo seems to let it, we're going to end up with a politician who paid his dues to the Democrats rather than a statesman who really paid his dues to foreign policy for this country. I'm sorry, but just because someone is a popular senator does not make that person the right person to represent our country to the rest of the world. Just because someone is good at getting legislation passed in an old boy's school network of government does not mean that person is the right individual to be negotiating with the future of America with some of the most nefarious characters in the world. We need someone with stature like Powell, not some politico that is really looking for the next rung to keep climbing up that political ladder.
So, Obama really has a choice here. He can go for the political solution, which makes him just like any other politician, or he can continue his promise of change and show us that the future is going to really be one of positive change where he puts the interests of the country in front of him, instead of behind him as an afterthought.
Labels: Politics
Stumble It!
Thursday, November 06, 2008
The Many Fascinating Sights of Korea
Well, I thought you might all like a little trip through one of my wanderings in Korea. As you can see, I am learning a great deal of information about this very foreign land. I hope to continue to enlighten the rest of you about how foreign it really is.
Labels: Korea
Stumble It!
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
Why California's Proposition 8 (ban on gay marriage) Passed
But there was a secondary demographic impetus that caused the measure to pass, and it's going to be very interesting to see how people deal with this piece of the puzzle, because I can't really see a politically correct way to handle the issue without causing an eruption in the usual suspects that make up this grass roots membership. Here, I'll post some interesting information from the election, and tell me if you see a concern.
Maybe it's just me, but I see an anomaly in the data that is a glaring problem. It seems that if the proponents of a change to this constitutional amendment want to attack the issue again, that grass roots momentum is going to have to address a specific demographic that they have always kind of thought was in their pocket all along.You see, there's an interesting dilemma here because these wannabe social activists sort of assume that African-Americans will automatically support social issues because they have been treated as marginalized, disenfranchised people for so long. But when this issue of gay marriage, or gay rights, came up, the African-American community has come out as a direct barrier to the social agenda.
Why this group is the most active supporter of anti-gay rights, or anti-gay marriage, is really for others to discuss. What is important is that the people who keep trying to force tolerance down the throats of those who don't see eye to eye with them on such issues are going to have to realize that they have a much different fight on their hands that can't be won by shaming the other side or hoping that things will just work out for their cadre, because things won't.
You see, a whole new approach is needed, or the issue will never turn in their favor. Think about this, which is what educated activists should have been thinking in the first place: The general demographic of a social activist in this country, and especially in California, tends to be a young, white college-educated female. The last characteristic is less prominent in the statistics, meaning we can level it out to approximating a young, white college-educated person. The issue is being argued as "civil rights" or "human rights". The usual rhetoric has been to condemn anyone that is against gay rights as someone who is out of touch and intolerant. Now, notice who makes up the greatest constituency of the demographic they are targeting. In other words, let me explain it: YOUNG, WHITE COLLEGE-EDUCATED PEOPLE ARE TELLING AFRICAN-AMERICAN CITIZENS THAT THEY NEED TO BE MORE TOLERANT TOWARDS OTHER PEOPLE. Now, honestly, try to sell that one. Privileged young folk are making the argument that a long-time, disenfranchised, marginalized group of people who have fought over the span of generations to achieve their civil rights THAT they need to be more tolerant of other people. Good luck with that project.
So, having said that, for reasons I don't understand because the people who should be listening never do (they always know better than anyone else because THEY "understand things better than the rest of us"). If they want to win this next time, they need to approach the African-American community with a respectful attitude and explain why gay marriage should be allowed. Attempt to shame them, you lose. Attempt to reason with them using third graders' analysis, you lose. There can be such a commonality between both sides, but as long as they keep "assuming" it's just going to fall in place, then they'll continue to lose and never understand why they lost.
I've been reading some analysis on why Prop 8 passed, and again, it seems to be a choir singing to another choir without even knowing the song.
Labels: Elections
Stumble It!
The Election of Obama, the Healing of America, and the Future of Cooperation and Friendship with the Rest of the World
But when it came to the election, people became so divided that they stopped seeing clearly. Instead of seeing people who disagreed with them as the other side of the family that loves you but holds you in check, people saw anyone who disagreed with them as enemies, as people who not only had to be defeated, but had to be disgraced, dishonored and, if possible, destroyed. This has been politics in this country for some time now, and right now, things can get better, or we'll be turning over a cesspool of political disfunctionality to those who come behind us. It's our choice, even though we sometimes make it without thinking about exactly what we are doing when we finally do it.
The United States has suffered greatly because of the misguided intentions of a few who believed they had the best intentions at heart. And they probably did. But their thinking was archaic and outdated. Their thinking was confrontation leads to solution, but that's 19th century thinking that led to 20th century destruction. The future needs to be something different, and unfortunately, people have been swimming in the same muck for so long now that they are no longer capable of thinking about alternatives other than what someone may have tried before. Unfortunately, hitting the same nail into a board only goes so far before you're just breaking wood. The future needs something different than what we are capable of achieving with our think tanks of old ways and diplomats of ancient ideas. The world has been crying out for a future direction, and all we keep hearing is old ways that rarely worked in the past as if they will somehow work some day in the future.
What the world needs is directed cooperation, not mandated imperialism or negotiated compromise. In interpersonal communication literature, one of the final achievements of success in successful communication with another person is not the predicted compromise, but an understanding with the other person that together both of you can achieve a combined learning process that leads you both to a successful outcome that is not a compromise for either but achievement for both. People still don't think that way. Even counselors rarely think this way, telling people that one person must compromise so that two people can reach a commonality (although it is usually directed at both partners, so that both compromise).
The future can be one of successful cooperation, but only if the most powerful nation on the planet realizes such a future can be achieved. Right now, we live in an era where our diplomats play catch up games with international affairs. If someone treats us unfairly, we treat them unfairly in return. If someone does something nice for us, we produce easier trade routes into our borders. That may seem, on the surface, to be the answer to achieving successful economic stimulation, but it is really only temporary, and in most cases does not produce friendships that are long-lasting but develops trade relationships that last only as long as it is economically viable for both sides. In a game theoretic framework, this means that we continue to prosper as long as our "friends" prosper, but once one of us drops out of the game, the only path usually ends up being one that utilizes either the proverbial carrot or the stick. Our paradigm does not know any other functionality.
I suggest the future needs to look at this game theoretic and introduce the idea of cooperation and generational footprinting. What this means is that our targeted friends should not just be those who do right by us, but that when we do right by those who are in our economic and political spheres of influence, we must also do right by those who are overlapping our partners' economic and political spheres of influence as well. This isn't the old "my friends of my friends are my friends" but more a directed desire to work towards friendly relationships with those who border us, and recognize changes in our relationships to where we share certain, fundamental characteristics, such as the desire to wear plaid pants (dumb example, I know). The more functions we share with this neighbor where we wear plaid pants, the more likely we are to also begin sharing other characteristics, like wearing the same kind of hat. This expands out into the cultural realm as well, so that over time we become more like our neighbors, and our neighbors become more like us.
Then we focus on their neighbors, and we look for when those neighbors (who may have very few dealings with us as well), and if we see them wearing plaid pants, we reward them by opening up functionality spheres with them so that we share more venues where we can both show off our plaid pants, so that we, too, might begin to share other attributes and then become more and more like our friends.
This is a simplistic example of the model I'm proposing, but at the same time it also leads to the ability to create long-lasting friendships with potential friends and enemies. This isn't a new process by any stretch of the imagination, but a recognition of certain mathematical principles that do exist in raw social interactions. I use a matrix application to run the interation mathematics that drives the process, but what is important is that nations that are actively involved in attempting to build stronger friendships must be as willing to recognize the change in others as well as accept changes within themselves because self-reflective entity nations have a tendency to attempt to self-correct themselves when they see change as an error rather than a natural progression of cooperative behavior.
This is kind of an offshoot of the FOT (Friendship Over Time) Theory that I created with K. Bruce, and it is going to be presented at the NCA National Conference. We sent a shortened version of the process to the Obama campaign during the last month of the election, as I felt it was important to at least make an attempt at trying to find a better alternative to the rotten ways the US attempts to conduct international relations. My guess is that our letter was either ignored, passed on to some flunky who ignored it, or treated as fan mail. Unfortunately, there are really few avenues for an academic theorist to try to make one's ideas known, especially ideas of such magnitude that would require enlightened leaders to take notice. So I just thought I would say that I at least gave it a try before realizing that in most cases, no leader ever really vies for changing the way things are, even if one's campaign is run on the idea of change.
There is a better way. Making it known is a deeper struggle than finding the solution.
Labels: Communication Theory, Elections, Friendship Over Time, Obama
Stumble It!

